Error-Ref.com

You are here: Home / Search for "center"

Search Results for: center

Mules Wrong Anvil Die

PART III. Die installation Errors:

Mules: 

Wrong anvil die

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies. In this case the wrong anvil die was installed in a coin press.

This Malaysian 10 sen mule was struck on a 10 sen planchet in a reeded 10 sen collar and carries a normal 10 sen obverse. The reverse face was struck by a 1 sen reverse (anvil) die.

This dual denomination mule was struck in 1993 by the Denver mint. It had the correct hammer die (cent die) and the coin was struck on the correct planchet. However, the anvil die (dime die) was mistakenly installed in the coin press which resulted in this unique combination.

Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions.
.

This dual denomination mule coin was struck in 1999 by the Philadelphia mint. It had the correct hammer die (cent die) and the coin was struck on the correct planchet. However, the anvil die (dime die) was mistakenly installed in the coin press which resulted in this unique combination.

Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions

Mules Wrong Hammer And Anvil Die

PART III. Die Installation Errors:

Mules: 

Wrong hammer and anvil die

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies. In this case both hammer and anvil dies were not correct.

This Malaysian mule would be classified as a “double mule” It was struck by a 1 sen obverse die and a 1 sen reverse die installed in a 10 sen press. The coin was struck on a copper-nickel 10 sen planchet inside a 10 sen collar and shows the reeded edge normal for the 10 sen denomination (the 1 sen coin has a smooth edge).

Mules Wrong Hammer Die

PART III. Die Installation Errors:

Mules:

Wrong hammer die

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies. In this case, the wrong hammer die was installed in a coin press.

The 2005 Malaysian mule shown below was struck on a copper-nickel 10 sen planchet inside a reeded 10 sen collar and features a normal 10 sen reverse design. The obverse (struck by the hammer die) shows an unexpected and appreciably smaller 1 sen design. This resulted in a weakly struck periphery on the reverse face. A normal 1 sen coin is copper-plated steel.

 

This dual denomination mule was struck in 1995 on a dime planchet by a press that was striking dimes.  The reverse die (anvil die) was appropriate while the obverse die (hammer die) was incorrect.

Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions.

Regular Issue Die Muled With Commemorative

PART III. Die Installation Errors:

Mules: 

Regular-issue die muled with commemorative

die, September and November 1999

Canadian quarters

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies.

Two 1999 mules from Canada’s Millennium series fall into this category. A September 1999 quarter and a November 1999 quarter pair the intended commemorative reverse (hammer) die with an incorrect obverse (anvil) die that was supposed to strike ordinary quarters with a caribou reverse. As a result, the coin carries no denomination. Thousands of each were produced.

The image below is a November 1999 Canada Millennium quarter muled with an obverse (anvil) die intended to be used for ordinary quarters with a caribou reverse. It still has a proof-like finish, though, suggesting it was polished in the same fashion as the Millennium dies.

Mule: Die Lager Than Norm Die / Collar

PART III. Die Installation Errors:

Mules: 

Mule die larger than normal die and collar

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies.

The unique 1995 cent/dime mule struck on a dime planchet inside a dime collar fits this description.

A normal dime reverse die was employed as the anvil die, while a cent obverse die was employed as the hammer die. The striking of this mule must have been a noisy affair, as the periphery of the hammer die would have collided with the beveled entrance of the collar with each down-stroke.

Mules Involving Pattern Dies

PART III. Die Installation Errors:

Mules: 

Mules involving pattern dies, various types

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies.

This is a broad category (a genus?) that could encompass a variety of mule species. While little knowledge exists of any standard dies being paired with a pattern die, two possibilities are shown below.

 A Chilean 100 pesos planchet struck with identical obverse pattern dies. It is believed this two-faced mule was struck in the Santiago mint.

Below is an outer ring meant for a bi-metallic coin from Chile. It too shows identical obverse pattern dies.

Pseudo-mules

PART III. Die Installation:

Mules: 

Pseudo-mules

Definition: A coin with the same raised design on each face, but which is struck with a pair of conventional dies.  Pseudo-mules can be generated by accident or by intent.  There are three ways a pseudo-mule can be generated.  For purposes of this discussion, we’ll describe a pseudo-mule that carries the design of the hammer die on each face.  An example would be a two-headed cent from the 1980’s (before inverted die installation was introduced by the U.S. Mint).

Method 1. A coin flips over on top of a planchet, landing within the collar or in a perfectly centered position. The
two discs are struck together. The original die-struck hammer die design is flattened. The original die-struck anvil die design is obliterated by the force of the strike. The double thickness causes an increase in effective striking pressure, which facilitates erasure of the anvil die design.

Method 2. Two planchets are struck together within the collar, producing two in-collar uniface strikes. The bottom coin is ejected while the top coin flips over and lands on another planchet. During the second strike, the original hammer die design is flattened, while the original featureless surface is struck by the hammer die.

Method 3. The sequence begins with a coin with an in-collar, first-strike brockage of the hammer die design on the face normally struck by the anvil die. The coin flips over and lands in the collar. A planchet is fed on top of it and then struck. The top coin has on its bottom face a first-strike counterbrockage of the hammer die design.

A 2005 Malaysian 1 sen coin shown below carries the obverse design (struck by the hammer die) on each face. It is an intentionally fabricated, double-struck pseudo-mule. Method 2 was almost certainly employed.

This undated triple-struck nickel shown below displays a spontaneous, off-center pseudo-mule of the obverse (hammer die) design. The second strike was an off-center uniface strike, with the obverse design die-struck. The coin flipped over on top of a planchet and received a second off-center uniface strike in exactly the same spot. The die-struck obverse design from the second strike was flattened by the third strike. The uniface surface from the second strike received a fresh-die struck obverse design during the third strike.

Mules Wrong Anvil Die 1993-D And 1999(P) Cent/Dime Mules

PART III. Die installation Errors:

Mules: 

Wrong anvil die

Definition: Mules are coins struck by mismatched dies. In this case the wrong anvil die was installed in a coin press.

This Malaysian 10 sen mule was struck on a 10 sen planchet in a reeded 10 sen collar and carries a normal 10 sen obverse. The reverse face was struck by a 1 sen reverse (anvil) die.

49291972

 

This dual denomination mule was struck in 1993 by the Denver mint. It had the correct hammer die (cent die) and the coin was struck on the correct planchet. However, the anvil die (dime die) was mistakenly installed in the coin press which resulted in this unique combination.

 5142161751421618

Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions.

 

This dual denomination mule coin was struck in 1999 by the Philadelphia mint. It had the correct hammer die (cent die) and the coin was struck on the correct planchet. However, the anvil die (dime die) was mistakenly installed in the coin press which resulted in this unique combination.

 5279298552792987

Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions

Lamination: Fold Over Before Strike

PART V. Planchet Errors:

Lamination:

Lamination Fold-over Before Strike

Definition: A lamination error occurs when metal flakes off the surface of a coin or planchet.  It is generally believed that the flaking, peeling, and cracking is due to impurities in the alloy which causes metal to separate along horizontal planes of weakness.

When a lamination flake fails to detach completely and instead folds over before the strike, it leaves a “struck-through” error beneath it.  Lamination flakes that break off completely and that are struck into planchets different from the ones they’re derived from are responsible for a subset of those struck-through errors designated as “struck through a fragment”.


The image above shows a 1964(P) Lincoln cent with a semi-lunar (half-moon shaped) lamination flap that lifted up from the edge of the coin and folded over onto what would eventually become the obverse face of the coin.

 

The 1957(P) Lincoln cent pictured above had a lamination flap fold over onto what would become the obverse face.  When the flap was struck into the coin, it left a semi-lunar struck-through error beneath it.  The flap broke off after the strike but was retrieved.

Lamination Cracks

PART V. Planchet Errors:

Lamination:

Lamination Cracks

Definition: Lamination errors are planchet errors in which the surface of a coin cracks and flakes.  It is generally believed that lamination errors are caused by contaminants in the alloy that cause the metal to separate along the horizontal plane.   Lamination errors can develop before or after the strike.  They are generally restricted to solid-alloy coins.  The term “lamination error” is grammatically incorrect as the metal is actually delaminating.  While “delamination error” would be the proper term, we’re stuck with the terminology we’ve inherited from previous researchers.

Lamination errors are closely related to split planchets and clam-shell splits.  In the latter two errors, separation also occurs in the horizontal plane, but at a deeper level.

A lamination crack is one common manifestation of a lamination error.  The surface of the coin simply cracks and may lift up slightly on one side.  Lamination cracks are sometimes mistaken for die cracks and split dies by novice collectors.

This 1954 Roosevelt dime shows a lamination crack crossing the President’s head.


  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • …
  • 52
  • Next Page »
  • Home
  • Introduction To This Website
  • Error-ref.com News
  • Comprehensive Error-Variety Checklist
  • Index Of Completed Entries
  • Part I. Die Subtypes:
  • Part II. Die Varieties:
  • Part III. Die Installation Errors:
  • Part IV. Die Errors:
  • Part V. Planchet Errors:
  • Part VI. Striking Errors:
  • Part VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:
  • Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:
  • Part IX. Post-Strike Mint Damage:
  • Part X. Wastebasket / Composite Categories:
  • Part XI. Non Errors:
  • Featured Articles Of Interested
  • Interest & Not So Interesting Facts
  • Other Sites And Forums Of Interest
  • Our Thanks Go To
  • About The Authors
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025